AAQ Computing, formally the "OCR Level 3 Cambridge Advanced National (AAQ) in Computing: Application Development (H029/H129)", is a Level 3 academic qualification first taught in September 2025. It is assessed across three mandatory units: F160 and F161 by written exam, and F162 by internally-marked NEA coursework, plus optional NEA units for the Extended Certificate. This free guide covers everything: unit-by-unit revision notes, exam technique, grading explained, and honest answers to the most-searched questions about AAQ Computing.

Free & spec-aligned. Everything on this page and across revision.jackghx.com is free, updated for the OCR Cambridge Advanced National Computing: Application Development specification (first teaching 2025), and written by students for students. All students – including the author – achieved A-equivalent predicted grades using these resources. No subscription. No paywall.


Key facts – OCR AAQ Computing: Application Development

Awarding body OCR (Cambridge University Press & Assessment)
Qualification codes H029 (Certificate) · H129 (Extended Certificate)
First teaching September 2025
First exam series 2026
Grading scale Distinction* / Distinction / Merit / Pass / Unclassified
UCAS tariff Yes – D* on H129 ≈ A* at A Level (check OCR/UCAS)
Qualification family Alternative Academic Qualification (AAQ) · Cambridge Advanced Nationals
Replaces OCR Cambridge Technicals in IT (being defunded)
Assessment model Full compensation – every mark counts, no unit hurdles

What is AAQ Computing?

AAQ Computing is the "OCR Level 3 Cambridge Advanced National in Computing: Application Development", a Level 3 academic qualification that is equivalent in size to roughly half an A Level (Certificate, H029) or one full A Level (Extended Certificate, H129). It is awarded by OCR, part of Cambridge University Press & Assessment, and sits within the Cambridge Advanced Nationals (CANs) suite of Alternative Academic Qualifications (AAQs).

The qualification focuses on the software development lifecycle, application design, human-computer interaction, UX/UI principles, and the technical and legal knowledge underpinning modern software. Unlike A Level Computer Science, AAQ Computing does not require students to program, but rather the emphasis is on understanding how software is planned, designed, developed, and delivered, rather than writing code from scratch.

The "AAQ" label – Alternative Academic Qualification – signals that this is an academically rigorous alternative to traditional A Levels, not a vocational substitute. It is designed to sit alongside A Levels in a sixth-form/college programme, carries UCAS tariff points, and has received support from universities. The qualification was first taught in September 2025 and takes its first exam cohort in 2026, making the content on this site some of the earliest free revision material available for the spec.



Not to be confused with, AAQ Computing is not:
  • Pearson Level 3 AAQ BTEC National in Computing – a completely separate qualification from a different exam board, first teaching September 2026. Different unit codes, different content, different board.
  • OCR Cambridge Technicals in IT – the predecessor suite of qualifications, which are being defunded. AAQ Computing (Cambridge Advanced National) is effectively their replacement.
  • OCR A Level Computer Science (H446) – a separate, programming-heavy A Level. Different structure, different content, different grade scale.
  • T Level Digital – a different Level 3 qualification with a mandatory 45-day industry placement. Much larger in scope and structure.
  • Cambridge Technicals AAQ – a search term sometimes used incorrectly. The correct name is "Cambridge Advanced National" (not "Cambridge Technical") for this qualification family.

Qualification Structure: H029 (Certificate) vs H129 (Extended Certificate)

H029 is the Certificate (150 guided learning hours, roughly equivalent to half an A Level) and H129 is the Extended Certificate (360 GLH, equivalent to one full A Level). Both require the same three mandatory units; the Extended Certificate additionally requires one or more optional NEA units from F163–F166.

Feature H029 – Certificate H129 – Extended Certificate
Guided learning hours 150 GLH 360 GLH
A Level equivalence Approx. half an A Level One full A Level
Mandatory units F160, F161, F162 F160, F161, F162
Optional NEA units None required One or more from F163–F166
UCAS tariff Yes (lower value) Yes – D* ≈ A* at A Level
Best suited to Students taking computing as a supporting subject alongside 3 A Levels Students taking computing as a primary subject with full A Level weight
Most sixth forms and colleges teaching AAQ Computing offer the Extended Certificate (H129). Check with your school which size of qualification you are enrolled on, as this determines whether you need to complete an optional NEA unit.

The Three Mandatory Units at a Glance

Every AAQ Computing student takes F160, F161, and F162 – two written exams and one internally-marked NEA coursework unit. The table below summarises the key assessment details. Note: some OCR documents show a slight inconsistency on the F161 exam duration (1 hr 15 min vs 1 hr 30 min) – always confirm from the current published specification on ocr.org.uk before your exam.

Unit Full title Assessment Duration Marks GLH
F160 Fundamentals of Application Development Written exam 1 hr 15 min 60 75
F161 Developing Application Software Written exam 1 hr 15 min* 60 70
F162 Designing and Communicating UX/UI Solutions NEA (internal coursework) 75

* Confirm F161 duration from the latest OCR specification PDF – OCR documents show minor inconsistency on this figure.

F160 – Fundamentals of Application Development (Revision)

F160 covers the principles, planning tools, and design concepts that underpin application development – from software types and development models through to HCI and the job roles involved in building software. It is assessed by a 1 hour 15 minute written exam worth 60 marks. Approximately one minute per mark is a sensible time guide.

F160 has six topic areas (TAs). The notes on this site cover all six in full – the breakdowns below give you a sense of scope before you dive in:

TA1 – Types of software used in application design

Programs vs applications, Operating systems, Application types, Software categories, Software types

The eight application types the spec defines · Network, open, and proprietary operating systems · Shareware, freeware, open-source software, etc, with their distinctions and implications

TA2 – Software development models

Seven development models & The phases of software development

When each model is appropriate · Rapid, throwaway, and evolutionary prototyping – the difference matters · Advantages and disadvantages of each approach · Know all planning phases

TA3 – Planning application development projects

Importance of planning & Project planning tools

Advantages and disadvantages of planning · Gantt vs PERT vs CPA – what each shows and when to use it · SWOT analysis in a project planning context

TA4 – Application design scoping

Gathering client requirements, specification of requirements, decomposition methods

Methods for gathering client requirements · How a system must do and operate · Decomposition methods for breaking down requirements

TA5 – Human computer interface and interaction

Types of human-computer interaction, types of device, visual design considerations, HCI design documents and diagrams

HCI design principles · Accessibility considerations · How interface design decisions affect the end user experience

TA6 – Job roles and communication skills

Job roles in application development, Communication skills

Responsibilities of each named role · Skills associated with each position · How roles interact across the development · Types of communication techniques used

Highest-risk F160 areas: Software development models – you must know all six and be able to recommend the right one for a given scenario with justification. The Gantt / PERT / CPA distinction is also heavily tested. Expect scenario-based questions where you apply a model to a described project, not just define it.

F161 – Developing Application Software (Revision)

F161 covers the technical, operational, and legal considerations involved in developing and deploying application software – including the devices software runs on, data formats, APIs, security, and the legislation developers must comply with. It is assessed by written exam alongside F160.

F161 has six topic areas. Expect questions that ask you to apply legal knowledge and security concepts to realistic scenarios – not just list definitions:

TA1 – Application software considerations

Application platforms, devices, and storage locations

Consoles, desktops, laptops, servers, smart devices, tablets, wearables, haptic devices – their characteristics and implications for software design · Elasticity & scalability as development considerations

TA2 – Data formats and flow in application software

Data formats and data types, data flows, and data states

ASCII · CSV · Fixed-width · JSON · XML – when and why each format is used · Data flow diagrams at Level 0 and Level 1 · Black box principles in software design

TA3 – APIs and protocols

Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) & Protocols and the TCP/IP stack

What APIs are and how they enable application integration · Communication protocols relevant to application software · Why APIs matter in modern software ecosystems

TA4 – Application software security

Security threats and mitigations

Hacking, viruses, and malware as threats · Biometrics, RFID, encryption, firewalls, anti-malware, and permissions as countermeasures

TA5 – Operational considerations

Testing, types of application software installation, and policies

Knowing all test plan structures, test data, and types of testing · Types of software installations · Policies like Acceptable Use Policies (AUPs) and their purpose

TA6 – Legal considerations

Legislation and the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO)

Data Protection Act · Computer Misuse Act · Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) 2000 · Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations (PECR) – scope, purpose, and application to software development

Highest-risk F161 areas: The four legislation acts – know each act's name, scope, and how it applies to software developers. Data format comparisons (JSON vs XML vs CSV – when to use each and why) are a recurring question type. Security questions typically ask you to recommend a countermeasure and justify it for a given scenario.

F162 – Designing and Communicating UX/UI Solutions (NEA Coursework Guide)

F162 is an internally-marked, OCR-moderated NEA (Non-Examined Assessment) – it is coursework, not a timed exam. Students respond to a client brief by planning, designing, communicating, and reviewing a UX/UI solution. Evidence is produced across five topic areas and marked by your teacher against OCR's mark bands before a sample is moderated by OCR.

F162 Topic Areas

TA1 – Principles of UX/UI

UX vs UI, accessibility, usability heuristics, design principles

Understanding the distinction between UX and UI · Key design principles (consistency, feedback, visibility, error prevention) · Accessibility standards and why they matter

TA2 – Plan UX/UI solutions

Client requirements, user research, planning documentation

Gathering and documenting client requirements · User research methods · Planning the design process and creating a project timeline

TA3 – Design UX/UI solutions

Wireframes, prototypes, and design rationale

Low-fidelity to high-fidelity wireframe progression · Interactive prototype creation · Explicit justification of every design decision against UX principles

TA4 – Communicate UX/UI solutions

Client presentation, written justification, professional communication

Presenting designs for the client with appropriate supporting documentation · Written justification that explains design choices · Evidence of professional-quality communication

TA5 – Review and improve

Evaluating your solution against criteria and proposing improvements

Structured review of your solution against the OCR brief requirements and UX criteria · Specific identification of what worked and what to change · For Distinction: proposed improvements with before/after comparison grounded in named UX reasoning

What examiners want at each grade level

OCR applies a "best fit" model across all topic areas. The difference between Pass, Merit, and Distinction lies in the depth, independence, and quality of justification across your evidence.

Grade What this looks like in F162
Pass Basic wireframes present, some client requirements identified, limited justification of design decisions. Evidence is mostly complete but superficial in places. UX principles mentioned but not applied to the specific solution.
Merit Clear wireframes with fidelity progression, client requirements mapped to design choices, written justification explains most decisions with reference to UX principles. Evidence is complete. Review stage addresses most criteria.
Distinction High-fidelity prototype with documented progression from low-fidelity, every design decision explicitly justified against named UX principles, professional-quality communication throughout, and a detailed review that identifies specific improvements with before/after evidence and analysis of why each change was made.

Common F162 pitfalls that drop grades

  • Wireframes that never progress to high fidelity. Distinction requires evidence of a fidelity journey – show multiple versions. A single set of basic wireframes is a Pass at best.
  • Failing to demonstrate thorough interpretation of the OCR brief. F162 is set by OCR, not a real external client. You must show that your design decisions directly address the stated requirements of the brief – annotate your work to make the connection explicit. Markers want evidence that you have read and responded to the brief carefully, not a generic design piece.
  • Design decisions without explicit justification. Describing what you designed is not enough – explain why, naming the UX principle it satisfies (e.g. "this layout reduces cognitive load by grouping related elements, applying Law of Proximity").
  • A rushed or skipped TA5 review. Many students run out of time and write a vague review paragraph. A strong TA5 lists specific criteria, evaluates the solution against each one, and proposes concrete improvements with reasoning.
  • Copying textbook UX definitions without applying them. Examiners are marking application to your specific solution, not recall of theory. Every principle must be connected to a specific design choice.
Submission: F162 is internally marked by your teacher, then OCR selects a sample of student work for external moderation. Check your school's internal deadline – typically several weeks before OCR's moderation visit window. Do not leave this until the night before.

Optional NEA Units (F163–F166)

Students taking the Extended Certificate (H129) must complete one or more optional NEA units in addition to the three mandatory units. All optional units are internally marked and moderated by OCR. Which unit(s) your centre offers depends on your school or college – check with your teacher.

Unit Title What it involves
F163 Game Development Plan, design, and develop a playable game. Covers game design principles, mechanics, and iterative development and testing.
F164 Website Development Design and build a functional website responding to a client brief. Covers front-end development, usability testing, and accessibility.
F165 Mobile App Development Design and develop a mobile application. Covers mobile UX conventions, platform considerations, and app testing.
F166 Software Development Project An extended software development project covering planning, development, testing, evaluation, and documentation.
No free revision site currently covers all four optional units in depth – including this one. If your centre offers F163, F164, F165, or F166 and you would like notes added, the request panel on the Revision Hub lets you flag it.

Exam Technique for AAQ Computing

Both F160 and F161 are 60-mark written exams – approximately one minute per mark is the key time management rule. OCR's Sample Assessment Materials show a mix of short-answer questions (1–3 marks), structured questions (4–8 marks), and extended-response questions (up to 12 marks). The split across Sections A, B, and C may vary – check the SAMs for the current structure.

OCR command word glossary

The single most common reason for losing marks is misreading the command word and giving the wrong type of response. Memorise these:

Command word What OCR expects Typical mark range
Identify / State A brief, specific answer. One creditworthy point per mark. No explanation needed – adding one wastes time but doesn't hurt. 1–2
Describe Give key features or characteristics in enough detail to show understanding. More than a list; some detail expected for each point. 2–4
Explain Give reasons – use "because", "therefore", "this means that". Each mark typically requires a cause linked to an effect or consequence. 3–6
Discuss Present multiple perspectives, advantages and disadvantages, or different viewpoints. Balance is expected – do not just argue one side. 4–8
Justify Give reasons for a recommendation or decision, explaining why your choice is better than alternatives. Not just "because it is good." 4–8
Evaluate Weigh up strengths and weaknesses of something and reach a supported conclusion. Must include a judgement – do not leave the conclusion implicit. 6–12

Worked example – "Explain" question

Question: Explain one advantage of using an Agile software development model over a Waterfall model for a mobile app project. [3 marks]

Model answer: Agile breaks development into short sprints, so the client can review working software at the end of each iteration [point 1]. This means requirements can change mid-project without restarting from scratch [development], which is valuable for a mobile app where user feedback frequently reveals new requirements or changes after the initial design phase [application to context – secures the third mark].

Note the explicit cause–effect–context chain. Each clause earns a separate mark. "Agile is more flexible" alone earns zero – it is too vague without the "because" and "this means that."
Common exam mistakes to avoid: Writing feature lists when asked to "explain" (no marks without reasons) · Confusing development models – know the differences precisely, especially between rapid, throwaway, and evolutionary prototyping · Forgetting to apply your answer to the scenario – generic textbook answers score less than contextualised ones.

Past Papers, Sample Assessment Materials & Practice Questions

There are no AAQ Computing past papers – the first exam series is 2026, and the qualification was only first taught in September 2025. Any site claiming to offer "AAQ Computing past papers" is mislabelling content. Be critical of what you find online.

The closest official equivalent is OCR's Sample Assessment Materials (SAMs) – specimen papers produced by OCR to illustrate the format, style, question types, and expected difficulty. These are the primary practice resource for all 2026 students, alongside the specification itself. After the 2026 series, live past papers will be released by OCR.

Where to get the SAMs: Go to ocr.org.uk, search for "Cambridge Advanced National Computing Application Development H029" or "H129", and navigate to the Assessment section. The SAMs – including question papers and mark schemes – are free to download. The Student Guide to NEA Assignments (document reference 722895) is also available there and is essential reading for F162.

Use the SAMs exhaustively. Work through every question under timed conditions, then mark your responses against the official mark scheme. Identify which topic areas produce wrong answers and revise those specifically. The mark scheme wording also teaches you the vocabulary OCR rewards in extended-response questions.

This site will link to practice questions as additional resources become available after the 2026 exam series. Until then, the SAMs and spec-driven self-testing (using the flashcard app) are your best tools.

Grading: Distinction*, Distinction, Merit, Pass – and What "Full Compensation" Means

AAQ Computing uses the grading scale Distinction* / Distinction / Merit / Pass / Unclassified, and a "full compensation" model where every single mark you earn across all units contributes directly to your overall grade.

Full compensation – explained plainly

In some qualifications, you must achieve a minimum score in each unit to avoid failing overall. AAQ Computing does not work this way. OCR states that the full compensation model means "every single mark your students earn will directly contribute to their final grade." In practice:

  • There is no minimum hurdle you must reach in F160, F161, or F162 individually.
  • A strong F160 performance can compensate for a weaker F161 result, and vice versa.
  • Every mark from every unit – including F162 coursework – adds to your total.
  • This benefits students who are significantly stronger in one area than another.

UCAS tariff points

AAQ Computing carries UCAS tariff points. For the Extended Certificate (H129), a Distinction* is equivalent to an A* at A Level in UCAS tariff terms – a D* on the Extended Certificate carries the same UCAS points as an A* in a standard A Level. For the Certificate (H029), the tariff is proportionally lower. Always verify the current confirmed point values on the OCR website and official UCAS tariff tables – the exact figures are published by UCAS and can be updated.

Grade boundaries are not published in advance and vary between exam series. Do not rely on estimates. Check OCR's website after the 2026 exam series for the first confirmed boundary figures.

AAQ Computing vs A Level Computer Science vs BTEC vs T Level Digital

AAQ Computing is most commonly compared to A Level Computer Science, BTEC IT, and T Level Digital – but these are meaningfully different qualifications with different focuses, assessment structures, and intended pathways.

Feature AAQ Computing (OCR H129) A Level Computer Science (OCR H446) BTEC IT (Pearson) T Level Digital
Qualification type AAQ (Academic) A Level Vocational / Applied General Technical Level
A Level equivalence 1 A Level (Ext. Cert.) 1 A Level Varies (1–3 A Levels) 3 A Levels
Approx. % exam 40% (F160 + F161) 80% ~30–60% (pathway dependent) ~20% (core written exam)
Approx. % coursework / NEA 60% (F162 + two optional NEAs) 20% (programming project) ~40–70% (unit assignments) ~80% (placement + projects)
Programming required? No (concepts focus) Yes (significant coding required) Partial (pathway dependent) Partial (pathway dependent)
Industry placement No No No Yes (45-day minimum)
UCAS tariff Yes Yes Yes Yes
Focus Applied software concepts, UX/UI, project management, development lifecycle Theory, algorithms, data structures, computer architecture, programming Broad IT skills, project-based applied learning Industry-ready digital professionals, work-based learning
Best suited to Students interested in software, UX, and applied computing without heavy programming Students aiming for a Computer Science degree or careers in software engineering / research Students who prefer coursework-based assessment across a broad IT scope Students who want a direct route into digital industry employment

Will universities accept AAQ Computing?

OCR has received letters of support from universities – including Russell Group institutions – acknowledging AAQ Computing as a valid Level 3 qualification. However, acceptance varies significantly by university and by course. Competitive Computer Science courses at research-intensive universities may require A Level Computer Science and/or A Level Mathematics specifically. AAQ Computing is more likely to be accepted for courses in IT, Digital Media, Business Technology, UX Design, and related fields.

The honest advice: check the exact entry requirements for every university and course you are considering. Contact admissions tutors directly if AAQ Computing is not listed – the qualification is genuinely new (first sitting 2026), and some universities have not yet updated their public requirements. OCR maintains a page on university support for AAQ Computing on their website.

Entry Requirements, Universities & Careers

Typical entry requirements for AAQ Computing

Most schools and colleges require:

  • GCSE Maths at grade 4 or above (many schools ask for grade 5)
  • GCSE English Language at grade 4 or above
  • Some schools also ask for GCSE Computer Science or ICT at grade 4 or above – but this is not universal

GCSE Computer Science is not required by OCR and many students take AAQ Computing having studied ICT or with no computing GCSE at all. Check your school or college's specific entry criteria, as these vary.

Career routes

AAQ Computing builds knowledge and skills relevant to a wide range of technology careers. The qualification is particularly well-aligned with roles involving software development concepts, UX/UI design, and digital project management:

  • Software / Application Developer – building and maintaining software applications across platforms
  • UX/UI Designer – designing user interfaces and experiences (F162 directly develops this skill set)
  • Junior Web Developer – front-end or back-end development roles, particularly via optional unit F164
  • QA Analyst / Software Tester – quality assurance and testing in software development pipelines
  • Digital Project Manager – managing software projects using the planning tools covered in F160 (Gantt, CPA, PERT, SWOT)
  • IT Systems Analyst – analysing and designing information systems and software solutions
  • Mobile / Game Developer – routes opened by optional units F163 (game) or F165 (mobile)
  • Degree Apprenticeships – technology companies including BT, IBM, Capgemini, Accenture, and many others offer degree apprenticeships in software engineering and IT consultancy that accept AAQ Computing as entry evidence

For university entry, AAQ Computing is accepted by many institutions for degrees in Computing, Information Technology, Digital Media, Business Technology, and related subjects. For highly selective Computer Science programmes – particularly at Russell Group universities – check requirements carefully: these courses often specify A Level Mathematics and sometimes A Level Computer Science as core requirements.

How to Revise When There Are No Past Papers Yet

The absence of past papers is the defining challenge for the 2026 cohort, but it is manageable with the right approach. Every student sitting AAQ Computing in 2026 is in the same position. The students who do best will be those who are most systematic about using the resources that do exist.

  1. Use the specification as your revision checklist. Download the OCR specification PDF (free from ocr.org.uk). Work through every bullet point under every topic area. For each one, ask: Can I define it? Can I explain it with a "because"? Can I apply it to a scenario? If not – that is a gap to close.
  2. Work through the SAMs exhaustively and analytically. OCR's Sample Assessment Materials are the closest equivalent to past papers. Do every question under timed conditions, then check your answers against the official mark scheme. Pay close attention to the mark scheme phrasing – it shows the vocabulary OCR rewards.
  3. Prioritise active recall over passive re-reading. Research consistently shows that retrieving information (flashcards, self-testing, writing from memory) is far more effective than re-reading notes. Use the F160 / F161 Flashcard App on this site for structured active recall practice. Drill topic by topic, then shuffle all for mixed practice.
  4. Practise writing extended responses from scratch. Identify every "Explain", "Discuss", and "Evaluate" bullet in the spec. Set a timer and write a response without looking at notes, then compare to the spec criteria. This is the most direct preparation for higher-mark questions.
  5. For F162 – start early to allow for a complete design progression. OCR marks the full fidelity journey from annotated low-fidelity wireframes through to a high-fidelity interactive prototype. Start early enough that you can build out the prototype properly and still leave time for a thorough TA5 review – many students run out of time and write a vague paragraph. Your TA5 review should evaluate your solution against the OCR brief requirements and named UX criteria, then propose specific improvements with reasoning.
  6. Know the command words cold. Re-read the exam technique section above. The majority of marks lost by well-prepared students come from misreading command words, not lack of knowledge.
Suggested 8-week revision plan (for the exam period): Weeks 1–2: Full F160 spec coverage – notes, then active recall with flashcards. Weeks 3–4: Full F161 spec coverage – notes, then flashcards, with extra focus on legislation and security. Week 5: Complete the F160 SAM paper under timed conditions – mark it, identify weak areas. Week 6: Complete the F161 SAM paper under timed conditions – mark it, identify weak areas. Week 7: Targeted revision on your two or three weakest topic areas from both mocks. Week 8: Light review, command word practice, rest and preparation.

Frequently Asked Questions about AAQ Computing

These are the most-searched questions about OCR AAQ Computing. Each answer is written to be direct and accurate – click any question to expand it.

AAQ Computing and A Level Computer Science are both Level 3 qualifications, but they are hard in different ways. A Level Computer Science requires significant programming ability, strong mathematical thinking, and abstract theory – algorithms, data structures, computer architecture, and Boolean logic all feature heavily. AAQ Computing focuses on software development concepts, UX/UI design, project planning, and the legal and operational context of software. Students who are more comfortable with applied, conceptual work often find AAQ Computing more accessible; students who enjoy coding and theoretical problem-solving often prefer A Level CS. Neither is objectively harder – it depends on your strengths.

OCR has received letters of support from universities including Russell Group institutions acknowledging AAQ Computing as a valid Level 3 qualification. However, acceptance varies significantly by institution and by course. Some highly competitive Computer Science courses may specify A Level Computer Science and/or A Level Mathematics as requirements and may not list AAQ Computing as an accepted alternative. AAQ Computing tends to be more broadly accepted for IT, Digital Media, Business Technology, and related courses. Always check the exact entry requirements for your chosen university and course, and contact the admissions team directly if AAQ Computing is not listed. The qualification is new (first sitting 2026), so some universities are still updating their published requirements. OCR maintains a resource on university acceptance on their website.

For the Extended Certificate (H129), a Distinction* is equivalent to an A* at A Level in UCAS tariff terms. The exact number of UCAS tariff points is published by UCAS and confirmed by OCR. Always check the current UCAS tariff table on the OCR and UCAS websites for confirmed figures – these can be updated and we do not publish specific point values here to avoid giving outdated information. For the Certificate (H029), the tariff is proportionally lower than the Extended Certificate.

H029 is the Certificate – 150 guided learning hours, roughly equivalent to half an A Level. H129 is the Extended Certificate – 360 guided learning hours, equivalent to one full A Level. Both qualifications require the same three mandatory units: F160 (Fundamentals of Application Development), F161 (Developing Application Software), and F162 (Designing and Communicating UX/UI Solutions). The Extended Certificate additionally requires one or more optional NEA units from F163 (Game Development), F164 (Website Development), F165 (Mobile App Development), or F166 (Software Development Project). Most sixth forms and colleges offer the Extended Certificate (H129).

Yes – AAQ Computing is specifically designed to be taken alongside A Levels. The Extended Certificate (H129) is equivalent to one A Level in size, so most students take it as one of their three or four sixth-form subjects alongside two or three A Levels. For example, a student might take A Level Maths, A Level Physics, and AAQ Computing Extended Certificate. Check with your school or college for timetabling and any course combination policies.

The first exam series for AAQ Computing (OCR H029/H129) is 2026. The qualification was first taught in September 2025. Specific exam dates (day, month) are published in OCR's exam timetables, which are released each year – check the OCR website for confirmed dates as the 2026 series approaches. F162 coursework deadlines are set by OCR's moderation timetable and communicated by your centre.

GCSE Computer Science is not required by OCR. Typical entry requirements set by schools and colleges are GCSE Maths and English Language at grade 4–5 or above. Some centres additionally ask for a GCSE in Computer Science or ICT at grade 4 or above, but many do not. Check your specific school or college's entry requirements – they vary significantly between institutions.

No – there are no past papers yet. The first exam series is 2026. The qualification was first taught in September 2025. Any site or resource claiming to offer "AAQ Computing past papers" is either mislabelling something or referring to content from a different specification. OCR has published Sample Assessment Materials (SAMs) – these are specimen papers and are the closest equivalent available. Download them free from ocr.org.uk. After the 2026 exam series, OCR will release the live papers as past papers.

No – they are related but distinct qualifications. OCR Cambridge Technicals in IT are a suite of qualifications that are being defunded by the government. AAQ Computing (officially: OCR Level 3 Cambridge Advanced National in Computing: Application Development) is OCR's new qualification in the Cambridge Advanced Nationals (CANs) suite – effectively the replacement. The qualifications have different unit structures, different unit codes, different assessment approaches, and AAQ Computing sits within the new AAQ (Alternative Academic Qualification) framework. If you are studying AAQ Computing, you are on a different specification from Cambridge Technicals.

No – these are completely separate qualifications from different exam boards. OCR AAQ Computing: Application Development (H029/H129) was first taught from September 2025. Pearson Level 3 AAQ BTEC National in Computing is a separate qualification, first teaching September 2026. They have different unit codes, different content, different assessment styles, and are marked by entirely different organisations. If your school teaches AAQ Computing, check which board's qualification it is – they are not interchangeable and revision materials for one do not necessarily cover the other.

No specific programming language is compulsory in OCR AAQ Computing. The mandatory exam units (F160 and F161) test conceptual knowledge about software development, data, security, and legislation – not programming ability. Students may use languages such as Python or JavaScript for their optional NEA units (F163–F166) where practical development is required, but OCR does not prescribe a language. The choice is left to the student and centre. This is a key difference from A Level Computer Science, which requires students to write and trace programs.

Yes – Cambridge University Press has published an OCR-endorsed student textbook covering F160, F161, and F162. It is available via schools, colleges, and university presses, and Cambridge offers a 30-day free trial of the online version. This site (revision.jackghx.com) provides free, spec-aligned written revision notes as an alternative or supplement for students who cannot access the paid textbook. At the time of writing, no other publisher has released an AAQ Computing revision guide – there is no ClearRevise, PMT, or Save My Exams equivalent for this qualification yet.

Grade boundaries are not published in advance and vary between exam series. The 2026 exam series is the first sitting, so there are no historical boundaries to reference. After results day, OCR publishes the grade boundaries for each series. The qualification uses a full compensation model – every mark from F160, F161, and F162 contributes to your overall grade, with no individual unit hurdles. Check OCR's website after the 2026 results for the first confirmed boundaries.

The Best Free AAQ Computing Revision Resources (2026)

As far as we know, revision.jackghx.com is the only fully free site with written revision notes covering all three mandatory units of OCR AAQ Computing: Application Development – but we'll honestly point you to everything else that's useful too.

Other free resources we recommend

  • CSNewbs (csnewbs.com) – the other primary free revision site for AAQ Computing, with a page-per-spec-point structure. Good for topic-by-topic lookups. Recommended alongside these notes for breadth.
  • Craig'n'Dave (YouTube) – video explanations for individual F160 and F161 spec points, including prototyping models, arrow diagrams, software types, operating systems, and client requirements. Strong for visual learners. Search "Craig'n'Dave AAQ" or "Craig'n'Dave F160".
  • OCR's official specification PDF – free on ocr.org.uk. Use it as your definitive revision checklist. Every bullet point is a potential exam question.
  • OCR's Sample Assessment Materials (SAMs) – the only official practice papers before 2026. Treat these as gold. Download from ocr.org.uk, search H029 or H129.
  • OCR's Student Guide to NEA Assignments (722895) – essential reading before starting F162 coursework. Available free on the OCR website.
  • Cambridge University Press endorsed textbook – paid, but typically available via your school or college library. A useful companion to free notes.
Notably absent: Save My Exams, Physics & Maths Tutor, Seneca Learning, BBC Bitesize, SmartRevise, and 101computing.net do not cover AAQ Computing at the time of writing. This thin-competition landscape is why this site exists – to fill the gap until commercial revision publishers catch up.

What to Do Next

You now have the full picture of OCR AAQ Computing: Application Development – what it is, how it is assessed, what examiners want, and how to revise for it effectively without past papers. Here are the three most useful next steps:

Good luck with the 2026 exam series. This site was built because free, accurate revision resources for OCR AAQ Computing barely existed when these notes were first written. Subscription-based revision platforms had not touched this spec, and students were left hunting for content across scattered school uploads and YouTube playlists. You should not need to pay to revise for your qualification.

Jack Ghafari

Sixth-form student and developer who built revision.jackghx.com to make AAQ Computing revision free for everyone. Written by a student, for students. No subscription, no paywall, no login required.